Start with the legal entity that will sign the contract. Review dated financial statements, profitability, liquidity, cash generation and obligations, then turn missing or stale evidence into procurement questions and proportionate next steps.
Three free searches a day. No accounts to upload.(£27m − £9m) ÷ £18m
The current ratio is unchanged, but the asset mix is different. Check collection timing, inventory quality and liability maturities.
Simplified quick ratio assumes no other exclusions such as prepayments. No “safe” threshold or risk rating is assigned.Fictional figures for learning. Change the balance-sheet mix to see why the same current ratio can need a different explanation. This is not a credit score.
Structure one supplier review without collapsing financial observations and operational exposure into a black-box score. The result is a procurement handoff—not a default prediction or approval.
No upload or account save. Entries remain in this browser page until you download them or leave. Do not enter confidential financial contents, personal data or credentials. Only the visible research brief—not your evidence notes or action owners—transfers to company research if you choose that control.
Complete the source context, five financial observations and an owned next action before relying on the record.
Still to resolve: supplier legal name; registration or legal identifier; country of registration; contract criticality; substitutability; financial evidence source; non-confidential source reference; valid reporting-period end; valid source-check date; entity or group reporting scope; three-letter currency code; monetary units; freshness-policy check; original-source check declaration; profitability and margin direction review; operating cash generation review; liquidity and near-term liabilities review; debt, covenants and other obligations review; reporting, filing and audit context review; at least one owned next action.
Suggested actions not yet selected: Record the procurement decision and evidence limits; Set the next financial review or monitoring event.
This logic does not calculate financial strength, probability of default or a procurement pass/fail result.Enter the supplier legal name and country to prepare a research brief. Your evidence observations and owners are not included.
Inspect a prepared financial report, compare suppliers on a consistent reporting basis, or review research and monitoring plans. For multi-supplier policies, country coverage or review governance, discuss an enterprise workflow.
A familiar brand may sit above several entities. Resolve the company that will sign the contract, then distinguish its standalone accounts from a parent or consolidated group before using the figures.
Do the company number and accounting scope match the contracting supplier?
Examine profit, operating cash generation, cash, receivables, inventory, debt and current liabilities where disclosed. Recalculate material ratios from compatible periods and show the inputs.
What supports the current ratio, and how quickly could the assets become cash?
Turn older accounts, reduced disclosure and adverse movements into specific requests. Record the evidence, limitation, reviewer and action so procurement and finance can reach the decision from the same facts.
Do we need current management accounts, a cash forecast or debt details?
Available accounts can support a financial assessment. They do not establish delivery reliability, operational resilience, compliance or the business impact if a critical supplier fails.
Review earnings, cash generation, liquidity, leverage and obligations with their dates, units and scope. Historical accounts may lag current trading and can contain reduced disclosure.
Evaluate contract value, substitutability, lead times and continuity arrangements through procurement. These exposures are not inferred from a financial statement or ratio.
Sanctions, cybersecurity, quality, operational and legal checks need their own evidence and controls. Do not collapse these dimensions into one unexplained financial score.
Use the financial review to decide what evidence or control is needed next. These outcomes are a decision framework, not measured supplier results or approval thresholds.
| Evidence state | Proportionate next step | Do not conclude |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence is current and comparable | Continue the normal approval route, while recording the entity, periods reviewed and evidence limitations. | Do not convert an absence of identified concerns into a guarantee that the supplier will perform. |
| Accounts are old, reduced or incomplete | Request current management accounts, a cash-flow forecast, debt information or other evidence proportionate to the contract. | Keep unavailable fields separate from zero and note who supplied any non-public document. |
| Liquidity, profit or cash generation has deteriorated | Ask finance to review the causes, near-term obligations, funding headroom and management response. | A ratio movement is an investigation trigger, not a default prediction or automatic rejection. |
| The contract creates material dependency | Review alternatives, inventory buffers, parent support, payment terms and continuity measures with procurement and legal teams. | Historical accounts do not show your operational exposure or prove that support will be available. |
Document the reviewer, assessment date, legal entity, financial periods, calculation inputs, unresolved questions and agreed action. Apply your organisation’s approval policy; Veripoint does not approve or reject suppliers.
Set the review cadence according to supplier criticality, contract exposure and your own policy. Reassess when new accounts are filed, the contract changes materially or other verified events alter the decision. An alert should reopen the evidence review; it should not silently change an approval.
Inspect a prepared private-company financial report, compare potential suppliers on a consistent reporting basis, or review current research and monitoring plans. For a multi-supplier or cross-country workflow, discuss the required coverage and controls.
Build the review around the company that will sign your contract. Record what the accounts establish, what the procurement decision requires and which unresolved questions need current evidence.
| Review question | Evidence to retain | What remains unresolved |
|---|---|---|
| Is this our supplier? | Legal name, registration number, jurisdiction and individual or consolidated scope. | A parent’s resources do not establish the contracting subsidiary’s payment capacity or support arrangements. |
| What is the procurement exposure? | Contract value, criticality, lead time, substitutability and available continuity measures. | Financial statements do not show the operational impact on your organisation if this supplier fails. |
| How old is the financial picture? | Period end, filing date and retrieval date as separate fields. | A fresh retrieval of old accounts does not establish current trading or today’s liquidity. |
| What changed across compatible periods? | Profit, operating cash generation and material balance-sheet movements with consistent currency, units and scope. | A movement identifies a question; it does not explain the cause or predict default. |
| What supports the liquidity calculation? | Current assets and current liabilities from the same entity and date; current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities. | Asset composition, overdue receivables and payment timing need further investigation. A ratio alone is not a supplier approval. |
| Are changes comparable? | Period length, currency, units, reporting scope and any restated comparatives. | A change in reporting basis can explain a movement that would otherwise look like growth or deterioration. |
Keep unavailable values distinct from zero. If a required input is absent or the denominator is zero, leave the ratio unavailable and state why. Historical accounts do not establish current financial capacity.
Inspect the prepared Dyson financial snapshot · Understand the limits of financial coverage · Follow a figure to its filing context
Record the legal name, country and registration identifier. Confirm that the record matches the entity named in the contract.
Record the contract exposure, supplier criticality, alternatives and the evidence your policy requires. Financial statements do not establish this context.
Check period ends, filing dates, currency, units, period length and standalone or consolidated scope before interpreting trends.
Review profit, cash generation, liquidity and obligations where disclosed. Recalculate ratios from the displayed inputs and investigate material movements.
Export the evidence and unresolved questions. Request current information or escalate the review where the available accounts are too old, incomplete or concerning.
Review the available financial position of Dyson Limited, UK company 02627406, as a potential supplier. Confirm the entity and reporting period. Examine profitability, current assets, current liabilities, cash and debt where available. Explain liquidity calculations, stale or missing information and questions to ask the supplier. Do not assign a credit score or predict default.
Ten answers about supplier financial risk assessment.
Three free searches a day. No credit card required.