Build a first-pass financial due diligence evidence brief.
Screen an M&A target before or alongside the deeper review. Verify the legal entity, inspect available company financials and turn unsupported assumptions into prioritised data-room questions.
Three free searches a day. No accounts to upload.
BUILD YOUR REVIEW / INTERACTIVE RESEARCH BRIEF
Your review brief
Select the questions worth taking forward.
0/9
EVIDENCE TO INSPECT
Income statements · accounting notes · compatible prior periods
THE OPEN QUESTION
Management adjustments and customer concentration may require separate documents.
Selection builds a checklist; it does not mark the checks as complete.
Choose a review area to see the records, questions and gaps that matter. This planning tool does not perform or certify due diligence.
Legal entity and reporting perimeterReported versus calculated findingsPrioritised evidence requests
BUILT FOR YOUR RESEARCH
Screen the financial case without overstating the evidence.
01
Establish the reported baseline
Match the legal entity and accounting perimeter, then review available statements across compatible periods. Keep filing date, period end, currency, units and group scope beside the result.
Which entity and reporting basis support the seller's financial narrative?
02
Test the transaction hypotheses
Examine reported revenue, profitability, cash generation, working capital and financing. Treat a movement as a question until the records establish its cause and whether it is repeatable.
Which earnings or working-capital movements need management evidence?
03
Prepare the evidence handoff
Separate reported facts, reproducible calculations and unresolved items. Carry the source context and a prioritised request list into the data room, adviser review or investment-committee process.
What is supported now, what is missing and who should resolve it?
PRELIMINARY RESEARCH, CLEARLY SCOPED
Public records can open the review. They cannot close it.
Veripoint supports a first-pass target screen and evidence register. Formal financial due diligence remains transaction-specific and commonly requires authorised management information, specialist analysis and professional judgement.
First-pass screen
Use available accounts to establish the entity, reporting perimeter, historical baseline and questions that could affect the deal thesis.
Transaction workstream
Management accounts, ledgers, customer evidence, forecasts, debt documents and monthly working capital normally require authorised data-room access.
Deal conclusion
Quality of earnings, normal working capital, net debt and implications for price or the purchase agreement require appropriate advisers and agreed evidence.
TRANSACTION SCOPE
Know where the first pass ends.
Financial due diligence is a transaction workstream, not a single database search. Use Veripoint to establish the available record and prepare the handoff; use authorised company evidence and appropriate advisers to reach deal conclusions.
Evidence, output and coverage boundary at each stage of a transaction review.
Stage
Evidence
Useful output
Coverage boundary
Before data-room accessVeripoint fit
Available filings, entity and ownership context, reporting periods and reported financial trends
An initial hypothesis, evidence register and prioritised request list
Does not validate management representations or current trading
During financial due diligence
Management accounts, ledgers, customer data, forecasts, debt documents, tax records and monthly working capital
Tested findings, reconciliations and quantified adjustments
Requires authorised access, transaction-specific scope and appropriate specialists
At the deal decision
Accepted or disputed findings, valuation model, completion mechanics and the purchase agreement
Price, structure, protections, integration actions or a decision not to proceed
Cannot be concluded from an AI research summary or public accounts alone
EVIDENCE HANDOFF
Five controls for every material finding.
A concise evidence register is more useful than a long list of unranked observations. Keep enough context for another reviewer to reproduce the point and decide what happens next.
Entity and perimeter
Name the registered company, jurisdiction, registration number and group or individual reporting scope.
Period and units
Keep the period end, period length, currency and units beside every figure.
Evidence status
Label information as reported, calculated, management-provided or unresolved.
Reproducible calculation
Retain the formula and inputs for margins, growth, working capital and other calculated measures.
Decision consequence
State whether a gap affects value, financing, completion mechanics, protection, integration or the decision to proceed.
INTERACTIVE EVIDENCE HANDOFF
Build an owned data-room request log.
Record one target and six workstreams. Trace supported findings, turn gaps into specific requests and order the handoff by the decision consequence your team assigns.
Entries stay in this page until you download them or leave. Do not enter confidential documents, personal data or credentials. This tool does not retrieve a data room, verify management evidence, calculate transaction adjustments or recommend whether to proceed.
0 of 6 required workstreams are handoff-ready.
Complete and confirm the context, then record the workstreams and review the handoff.
0 supported · 0 action-ready gaps · 6 incomplete · 0 decision escalations. No automated deal score is produced.
How the request order works
The CSV groups user-assigned proceed / stop consequences first; valuation, completion, financing and protection next; integration after that; and unassigned items last. It does not infer materiality or calculate a risk score. Your deal team remains responsible for scope, evidence, judgement and escalation.
Move from screen to authorised evidence.
Inspect the prepared report, run the target in company research, then use the exported log in the authorised data room. For monitoring, saved research or team integrations, compare plans or discuss an enterprise workflow. Only the visible company brief transfers to research; evidence references, requests, owners and dates do not.
EVALUATE VERIPOINT
Test the output against your deal workflow.
Inspect a prepared report, then research a representative target and confirm that the evidence, exports and coverage boundaries support your team’s first-pass review.
FROM TARGET SCREEN TO DATA ROOM
Turn each reported signal into a testable request.
Use available company records to establish a baseline and triage the issues that could change the deal. The deeper review should test those hypotheses against current, transaction-specific evidence.
Review area
Evidence available for a first pass
Evidence to request or test next
Target perimeter
Legal entity, ownership context and consolidated or individual account scope.
The entities, assets, liabilities and carve-outs included in the proposed transaction.
Revenue and earnings
Reported revenue, operating profit, period length and notes explaining material changes.
Monthly management accounts, ledgers, customer evidence and support for every proposed earnings adjustment.
Cash conversion
Reported operating cash flow and balance-sheet movements where disclosed.
Proof-of-cash, aged receivables, supplier timing, capital expenditure and other drivers of cash conversion.
Working capital
Year-end receivables, inventory and payables where disclosed.
Monthly balances, ageing, seasonality and the definitions required for a normal working-capital target.
Net debt and obligations
Reported cash, borrowings, leases, provisions and related notes where available.
Recent cash, facility and covenant evidence, guarantees, commitments and agreed debt-like item definitions.
Forecasts and deal thesis
Historical trends and the filing-period context available from the records.
Current trading, forecast assumptions, pipeline evidence and sensitivities linked to the investment case.
A year-end balance is a dated observation, not the cash available at completion or a normal working-capital target. Label every item as reported, calculated or unresolved, and keep the reporting date separate from the retrieval date.
State the deal hypothesis, target entity and financial issue that could change price, structure, protection or the decision to proceed.
02
Resolve the reporting perimeter
Confirm the legal company, jurisdiction and registration number. Separate the proposed target from subsidiaries, excluded assets and the wider group.
03
Review comparable evidence
Analyse compatible periods with currency, units, period length and accounting scope attached. Reproduce calculations and keep unavailable values distinct from zero.
04
Prioritise the unresolved items
Export the evidence and convert each material gap into a document request, management question or specialist workstream with a clear decision consequence.
TRY THIS QUESTION
Prepare a first-pass financial due diligence evidence brief for Dyson Limited, UK company 02627406. Confirm the legal entity, group or individual accounting scope and available periods. Review reported revenue, operating profit, working capital and debt where disclosed. Show source context and calculations. Label each finding as reported, calculated or unresolved, then prioritise the records to request in the data room.
Veripoint supports first-pass research into available company financial records. It helps resolve the entity, compare reported periods, reproduce calculations, retain source context and turn gaps into focused requests. It does not perform or certify a complete due-diligence engagement.
No. A screen helps establish the public or otherwise available financial baseline and prioritise questions. Formal financial due diligence is scoped to the transaction and usually tests management information, ledgers, contracts, forecasts, debt, tax and other authorised evidence.
A decision-led checklist should cover the target and reporting perimeter, financial history, quality of earnings, cash conversion, working capital, net debt and debt-like items, forecasts, tax, related parties, controls and unresolved evidence. Scope it to the deal rather than treating every request as equally material.
Buy-side work tests what the buyer may inherit and how findings could affect value, terms or integration. Sell-side work prepares evidence, resolves inconsistencies and anticipates buyer questions. The same records may be relevant, but the user, scope and decision consequences differ.
Yes, when relevant records are available. Confirm the exact legal entity and check which statements, fields and periods can be returned. Some private companies file limited accounts that do not disclose revenue, cash flow or the detail required for transaction conclusions.
It can help investigate available reported earnings and identify the questions a quality-of-earnings workstream should test. A full report commonly requires monthly management information, ledgers, customer data, adjustment support and professional review outside this workflow.
Check period length, currency, units, accounting policies and consolidated versus individual scope. Identify restatements where reported. A larger revenue or profit figure does not establish underlying growth when the reporting basis differs.
It can calculate a stated balance-sheet measure when the required inputs are available. A transaction working-capital target usually needs monthly balances, seasonality, agreed definitions and exclusions. A year-end current-assets-minus-current-liabilities result is not a substitute for that work.
The current company-research workflow uses available records and does not offer document uploads. Review management and transaction documents through your existing authorised data-room and adviser process.
Registered Free workspaces include three completed searches per day, resetting at 00:00 UTC. A completed research question or comparison uses one search. Reopening or exporting saved research does not consume another search; paid and enterprise options are shown on the pricing page.
START WITH VERIPOINT
Put your next question to the records.
Three free searches a day. No credit card required.
Financial Due Diligence Research Workflow | Veripoint